0

Fatphobia

Posted by Ellsee on Jan 22, 2010 in Thinking Fat

What makes Americans afraid of growing fat?  Although it is estimated that over 60% of all Americans are overweight to some degree, we still seem, as a people, obsessed with weight-loss and “fatphobia”.

Up until the end of WWII, chubby women were sexy.  Having a bit of “extra” flesh provided curves and softness in women, in particular.  Farther back, in medieval Europe, fatness was a sign of opulence.  One who had weight could afford to eat.  Thin, was the “fat” of the Renaissance through the Industrial Revolution, when the bourgeoisie capitalists could become “fat cats”–conspicuously consuming their wealth in front of their malnourished factory drones.  Yet, even then, women managed to maintain a stockier state.

Obsessive thinness doesn’t seem to really “hit” us until the 1960s, with Twiggy, of course, but perhaps even prior to that with the advent of moving pictures.  The camera always adds weight to it’s subjects, which is neither good nor bad as long as no one cares.  I suspect that as Hollywood improved its cinematic skills it began to realize that “normal” people did not actually “look” normal on the celluloid.  Perhaps they “encouraged” actresses to lose a bit here and there, or perhaps the women took it upon themselves to shed pounds so they might better impress their directors.

But, I don’t think Hollywood carries all the blame.  The 1950s was an age of techno-fascination.  Kitchen gadgets came to foreground as helpmeets for the middle class housewife, cars grew in number, and advances in aviation, medicine, science in general blasted us out of our comfortable round fatness into “keeping up with the Jones”.  Included in much of these developments were also changes in diet.  Not only did fast food hit our culture, but restaurant eating in general increased, and the advent of the pre-packaged meals (TV dinners) and boxed foods with dubious nutritional value and high concentrations of carboyhydrates, fats and petroleum by-products.

Jet forward to the 1980s and 1990s and we see our junk food culture in full bloom.  Instant macaroni and cheese, Chef Boyardee ravioli, Hot Pockets and a vast array of both standard and “lite” insta-meals and foods plague the grocery stores.  Many people (women predominantly) no longer prepare meals from scratch, but from boxes, or shove something into the microwave to “heat and serve”.  People lack the “time” to “fix a meal” and many (including myself) opt to eat out several times a week rather than slave over a stove.

Of course, this means ingesting lots of calories and little nutrition.  And growing fat as a consequence, because simultaneously we exercise less, get out less, stress more and sleep in fits.  Our entire lifestyle is frantic, and when people worry they eat–mostly the wrong foods.

Yet, this isn’t all.  As the middle class, the people who once took salacious pride in showing off their wealth by purchasing Wonder Bread and Hostess Twinkies, became the working class and the working poor, the cost of these unnatural, high-caloric foods became cheaper, relatively.  In fact, they are often half as much as any “natural” equivalent.  Broke?  Hungry?  A bag of Doritos is less than a buck.  Try to make a sandwich for that.   Or a casserole.

Welfare did wonders for fat people.  Since the poorest people in our society had little money to buy food with, they became creative.  Hamburger Helper stretches meals, so who cares if it puts on the pounds.  The kids gotta eat.  Calories and carbs are addictive.  Humans have a disposition toward fatty food with high carb contents.  Box meals fill that need very well.  And cheap works.  So, keep the crap cheap and the poor get fat.

The wealthy, by contrast, now conspicuously consume by purchasing at Whole Foods Market or Trader Joe’s, where they by “organic” brands in small quantities, or pre-made meals claiming to be handcrafted.  Or, they have professional cooks make their meals.  Either way, they can afford to eat right, to purchase a membership to the YMCA–in essence, they can afford to be thin.  The people who once flaunted their opulence through girth, now do so through thin.  Oddly, they seem to have lost their tolerance for fatness–perhaps because they have never had tolerance for the poor.  When they and those of their ilk were fat blobs rolling in their gold coins they loved their obesity.  Now, they despise it because it reminds them too much, perhaps, of the poverty they equally disdain and attempt to ignore.

Which means guilt also plays a role in our “fatphobic” culture.  The question is whether it is guilt for ignoring poverty as a greater problem, for creating a situation in which the poor must each unhealthily to live, or for rejecting fat to begin with?  Or, some combination of it all?

The question I raise now is who is actually more obsessed with fat?  Fat people or thin people?  Both?  It seems that regardless of the persons size, weight bubbles to the surface in many conversations, particularly with women.  ”I’ve got to lose a few pounds.”  ”No, thanks, I’m dieting.”  ”I think I can afford just one.”  These and other such statements indicate fat looms ever-present in the minds of many people.  Some more obsessively than in others.  Few people can simply eat and enjoy without some offering of how they are “going off diet”, or will “exercise it off later”–as if they are confessing a hideous sin that must be repented and absolved before the next day’s meal.  This, to me, is obsession.  (But arguably so is keeping a blog about fatness.)

Yet, contrarily, we seem to have an equally difficult time talking about fat.  Not in the Hollywood/television way in which fat people are mocked or equally insulted by viewing the fat as somehow to be pitied for lack of control as if fat is some kind of ~ism to worry about.  The conversations we cannot have about fat are those similar to conversations about race we seem unable to have effectively, either–conversations in which we can acknowledge the differences but understand that we need not dislike, distrust or mistreat each other based on these differences.

A what a wonderful world it would be.  [To be continued...]

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

 
0

You Fat Bitch!

Posted by Ellsee on Dec 30, 2009 in Thinking Fat

Stereotypes about fat people abound in our culture, but men fair much better than women.  Men can be portly, “large”, “big-boned”, “big”, corpulent even sounds elite and cultured.  Sure, fat guys get heckled on tv and in movies, but its always in that “aw, shucks!” joshing sort of way that lets the guy know he’s still respected by his male friends and even might deserve to get laid once in a while.

Fat women, on the other hand, that’s a travesty unto itself.  If you don’t think that a fat woman is tantamount to heretical, consider the sexy magazine ads for perfume or cologne.  The scantily clad woman and the topless male embrace with longing stares.  The suggestiveness of sex permeates the page.  Or, tv commercials with the promise of the hot chick if only you wore Axe aftershave, or bought the newest Scion.  Replace all those anorexic chicks with a 200 pound mamma and you will revolt nearly all American viewers.  Nothing says “turn off” more than a fat woman.

What’s astounding is the level of animosity our culture has toward fat women.  They aren’t just repugnant (at least at the media level), they are an embarrassment.  Unlike fat men with their beer bellies and their box of donuts, fat women rarely get air time–and when they do it’s a mockery. Neither Roseanne Barr or Rosie O’Donnell have ever gained the respect their male counterparts have enjoyed.  The message of the media is loud and clear.  Fat women should not be seen–which means never, ever heard or acknowledged.

When fat women are actually noticed, or make themselves unavoidable, they are presented in derogatory and demeaning ways, often with slurs aimed at their sexuality, temperament and nearly all preceded by the word “fat”:

  • fat bitch
  • fat whore
  • fat slut
  • fat dyke
  • bull dyke
  • fat pig
  • fat cunt
  • fat ass
  • and so on

Although it might be reasonably argued that fat women have a reason for being bitchy, let’s dismiss this for the moment and focus on why these invectives are used with such prevalence and ferocity.

Are fat women bitchy?  Some, but probably no more than skinny women, whom in my experience tend toward much more “bitchiness” than larger women simply because they don’t eat.  Not eating starves their brains and they can’t not be bitchy.  I’d be bitchy too if I didn’t eat in order to wear a size zero.  But, joking aside,  perhaps the problem here isn’t one of general personality but of size.  A large woman is noticeable.  She is not demure or diminutive.  She may be soft-spoken, but she’s present regardless of how much she might try to draw attention away from herself.  Nothing raises fear in the male mind more than a perceived threat by a woman (ooooh, castration time).  And a large woman, at least sub-consciously, represents the inner mother men fear will smother them.  Is this true?  Perhaps.  But, it looms in the recesses of our collective psyches.  If it didn’t Norman Bates would never have caused the terror he did because of his mother’s overbearingness.  The only way for a man to redeem his superiority against this barrage of adipose is to insult it into inferiority.  ”Fat bitch” reassures the unadjusted male that he is in control and still virile.  It allows him to de-humanize that which he fears rather than simply feminize her (which is impossible because of her girth; stereotype: “feminine”=skinny).

Women can also play the “fat bitch” card also.  I suspect much of this is due to rampant jealousy rather than fear.  A fat woman lives for herself.  She eats what she wants even if she doesn’t like what it does to her.  Excessively thin women want food, but fear it more–and they fear rejection by the male.  Fat=unfeminine, which is counter to a great deal of our human history.

Oddly, enough many other epitaphs regard fat women as sexually promiscuous or at another extreme, men-haters  (for good reasons, perhaps).  These might be true in some cases, but no more than with thinner women.  Many a sexually abused girl becomes lesbian or hates men; being fat is not a prerequisite.   Yet these slurs defy any logic, since the very “fatness” that makes a woman presumably undesirable to a man, would paradoxically make her a sex object for a man’s pleasure.    This might be the key to actually demonstrating the violent, controlling nature of rape, since by this logic a man would only desire to have sex with a fat woman if he was raping her, thereby demonstrating his “power” over her threatening obesity.

Then, there is the “fat-woman-as-sex-crazed-harlot” approach to this insult.  This presumes, in general, that all “whores” want it.  And they want it bad.  But, even more so with a fat woman, who simultaneously wants to consume the man by smothering him with her fat–overtaking his power with her beefy cunt.  Some men may desire this (I’m sure there are plenty of “stories” in Penthouse to titillate the chunky-loving bunches), but in general, I think our society (i.e., male-dominated society) resonates with terror at the thought of being subsumed by a fat woman in bed.  [Fortunately, NOT all men behave this way, and with the increase in fat everybody, I think such attitudes about weight and sex will undoubtedly change.]

As for the dyke bit–well, it’s just laughable.  Sure, there are bulldykes out there who would sooner rip a man’s balls off than give him the time of day, but fat is not necessarily a pre-requisite.  Lorena Bobbitt was thin and look at what she manage with a pair of scissors.

Yet, one can make connections combining the “fat bitch” diminutive with the “fat whore” accusation.  A “fat dyke” would perhaps be the ultimate insult since the targeted fat woman would become not just an object of ridicule, but detested utterly.  She’s so repulsive to the male that he cannot consider she would be appealing to any male whatsoever.  She must be lesbian–it is the only way feasible to reduce her to a level in which she can then be further insulted or mistreated.

Of course, as a counterargument to all of these notions is one even more perverse.  Men actually find themselves more attracted to the curvy, voluptuousness of a fatter female.  On a primal level, heterosexual men do not want sex with boys (i.e. skinny women shaped like sticks with vaginas), but want something to hang on to and feel beneath or on top.  Perhaps, the cultural images media produces are not representative AT ALL about how men might feel, but how society wants men to THINK about fat women.  Of course, I doubt every man has a secret fantasy about “doing it” with a fat girl, but it would go a long way to explain why many men end up with satisfying relationships with a less than skinny woman.

I think I could make the case that men repulsed by fat women could a) genuinely be repulsed and at some level threatened by a fat woman, or b) they are in fact attracted to fat women but are indoctrinated to believe that such attraction is “abnormal” and should be repressed.   This follows the notion that we often vehemently reject outright the very objects of our desire, particularly when we understand on a deeper level that society does not approve.

I’m sure that “truth” is muddled up somewhere in these places and more.  What is important is discussing them, whether right, wrong, true or false–so that we can rethink our positions on a very “weighty” issue that has detrimental effects on an every growing number of people, particularly women.

Tags: , , , , ,

 
0

Why am I fat?

Posted by Ellsee on Dec 29, 2009 in Thinking Fat

I suspect every fat person in America asks him-/her-self this question at one time or another, sometimes frequently. There are plenty of answers, most of which do not come from ourselves but the people and culture around us.

Here’s a list of the typical assumptions about why fat people are fat:

  • Over-eating
  • Lazy
  • Don’t exercise enough
  • Poor self-image
  • Emotional eating
  • Psychological protection
  • Slow metabolism
  • Poor eating choices (fast-food, junk food, etc.)

I doubt anyone can deny that these do not play a role in weight gain and overweight-ness among people, however, I also think these “reasons” have become the glib cliche rationales for those who do not, or have yet not struggled with weight issues to oversimplify fatness and the complexities involved in getting to “the fat” as well as keeping or losing it. Even the medical profession turns to the thin as some kind of “standard” for how fat people should conduct their lives in order to “shed the pounds” and be fat-free. Such a mindset ignores the fact that there are very real differences between the “fat” and the “thin”–I would dare say not just physically, but mentally as well. This is something I hope to discuss at another time.

Fat people get inundated so much by the world around them about their “problem” that it’s little wonder that as soon as the question is asked, the answers gush forth. Because the answers do not come from within, there seems little hope that any of the over-simplified, hyperbolized, often downright insultive, reasons provided will produce more than demoralization and a trip to McDonald’s. What’s the use? We fatties all “know” why we’re fat. There’s no sense in trying to figure out what every thin person knows already: Fat people are fat because they want to be. Otherwise, they’d be thin.

WOW! What a revelation! If only I could THINK myself thin, I’d be a glamorous size 6! I would instantly stop eating all the calories, take up jogging 10 miles a day and quit with the permanent scowl of self-loathing. [If you can't hear the sarcasm here, I question your sense of irony.]

But I digress. The question still glares me in the face: Why am I, not anyone else, not my husband, my colleagues, my family and friends, why am I, me, myself and I, FAT?

Here’s some thoughts about this in a linear form.

Yes, no doubt several of these reasons may fit under the “blanket” of pop culture rationales for my fatness. Yet, I don’t single out any one item as THE CAUSE for my obesity. I see them more as a complex puzzle, a fat “rubic’s cube” of sorts that is further wrapped up in layers of cultural perceptions, attitudes and messages about fat which all play a role in the “Total Fat Me”.

As much as I am responsible for my “fat-encouraging” decisions, so is our culture for its “fattitudes” toward people who are fat. We’ve come to recognize racism, and on a smaller scale, sexism, but fat-ism, is still something invisible to us–and a strange ~ism it is. But that’s a story for another day.

There’s a body of research that shows babies who were formula fed during the 1960s and 1970s are more likely to suffer from obesity than those breastfed during the same period. Apparently, the formula of the time increased the number of fat cells in the infant which could later be used to store fat. Moreover, formula fed babies worked less for their meal (from a bottle) and could gorge themselves before they could actually feel full. Consequently, as these infants grew, they were unable to modulate their intake of food since they needed more volume to make themselves “feel” full, even if they did not need as much to be healthy. I was fed both from a bottle and breastfed in the mid-1960s for my first three months. Then, I was bottle feed exclusively. I often do not feel “full” when others might.Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+
This one is common in many cultures and families. The partaking of a meal represents union and support. Love is demonstrated through the meal one makes and eats. This can become dysfunctional, however, when particular foods are singled out to indicate “more” love than others, or if food indicates partiality toward a particular family member, as it was in my family.Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+
Another blast from the past when food was scarce, children were admonished to eat it all lest they starve later wishing they had finished their meal the day before. Of course, it is important that children learn to TRY new foods and not be fussy about them. In our period of plenty of food, it would be better to encourage children to eat foods better for them than to simply inhale everything on their plate, regardless of its nutritional value.Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+
Having a parent steal food off a child’s plate only encourages animalistic behavior. When my father would steal the foods I liked the best, it only encourage me to eat them faster so that they would not be taken.Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+
Both my mother and paternal grandmother embodied this notion that the more a person ate, the more he/she appreciated the provider (cook), which was in these cases my mother and grandmother. Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+
For many of the reasons provided here and simply because food is an enjoyable part of life.Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+
This is another one of those crazy monkeys on the backs of the “diet” industry. The only consistently provable result of any regimented diet is weight-gain. In fact, people wanting to gain weight will often go on diets for a few weeks so that when they go off the diet, they will gain 5-15 pounds quickly. Diets starve the body of what it thinks it wants, whether it is actually healthy or not. When you go on a diet the first thing your body starts to crave is that which it cannot have. Go off the diet and you eat the item in excess. Furthermore, diets make most people bitchy simply because they deprive. I doubt I’ve ever seen a “happy” dieter, and if anyone claims to be, I’d wager they’re lying. Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+
The psychological cruelty imparted by one’s childhood peers can play a key role in body image. I know now that as a child I was not fat. But, telling me that at the age of 9 fell on deaf ears. It doesn’t matter what mom and dad say about the matter. I cannot think of anyway to ameliorate this problem other than to make everyone of the bastards who called me a fatty be force-fed worms the rest of their natural lives. We can only hope Karma pays a visit.Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+
It’s the consolation prize that doesn’t reject you. If you can’t get a date, or if the girls are embarrassed to be seen with you, the ice cream is always there. Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+
When I drink, I eat, and when I eat while drinking I don’t stop like I should.Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+
But, I try to walk and get out as much as possible. I get bored with bike machines and the like. And there’s so much more to life than over-exerting oneself physically. Yet, even when I was at my “peak” performance (in Japan), I still did not “measure down” to the right size. Some of us can tread the mill all we like and the fat will remain.Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+
Restaurant food has triple the calories of food prepared at home (maybe not, but it acts that way). Working makes me not want to cook and it’s so easy to just go to Red Robin.Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+
Slower metabolisms and excess weight do run in my family. It’s not easy fooling Mother Nature into giving up what has worked for millennia.Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+
I’ve always hated the hypocrisy of those who make broad declarations and then fall way short. I don’t think saying I will make a change in diet indicates I will. I just won’t happen until I am sufficiently motivated to do so, and we all know change does not come quickly.Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+
Just turn to the FoodTV Network or watch the Travel Channel with it’s excesses in both fine cuisine and “rustic” home-cooking, where the plates are mounded to the sky and everything has a layer of grease coating it. “Eat, Santa, EAT! Nobody wants a skinny Santa!”Powered by Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+

Tags: , , , , ,

 
0

Fat 101: Introduction

Posted by Ellsee on Dec 27, 2009 in Thinking Fat

Americans cling to a nearly cult-like mythology that “fat” is caused by “food”. Yet, if this were the case, all over-weight people in our culture should simply be able to stop eating the food that makes us fat and we’d instantly become sleek and fit. Obviously, food does play a role in the growing obesity of America.  And, certainly, there are “good” foods, those that are nutritious and maintain a healthy physical form, and those which are “bad”, empty-calories, high fat and sugared foods, chemical-laden and highly processed food which debilitate the natural functions of the body. Yet, to really look closely at fat, our fat culture, and our fat bodies, I think we must search beyond the food, into the psyche of ourselves and our collective attitudes regarding fat.  We must also not dismiss our biological heritage–a genetic heritage which still influences the foods we crave and the way we approach eating. This blog is my exploration into fat.  The nation’s increasing girth, and my own journey into fatness. I plan to approach this in several ways:  explore my perceptions and observations about fat in American culture and offer commentary thereon; provide narrative of my own history of fatness and the feelings generated by it; highlight popular cultural examples of “fattitudes” within contemporary American culture; and, finally, keep a detailed log of my dietary and exercise habits along with a tracking of my weight gains and losses over time. My goal is to keep daily entries for the next full calendar year, after which I will decide how to continue. Read more…

Tags: , , , ,

Copyright © 2010 Fatology All rights reserved.
Desk Mess Mirrored v1.4.4.1 theme from BuyNowShop.com.

This website uses a Hackadelic PlugIn, Hackadelic Sliding Notes 1.6.3+.